It would be an unusual case where a contempt finding would be made on a first non-compliance of an access order. Accordingly, in a usual case on a first default, a warning, admonition, or a penalty in costs would generally be more appropriate: Jean v. O’Callaghan, 2017 ONSC 4027, at para. 11.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.