What is the standard of review on pure questions of law?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Reotech Construction Ltd. v Snider, 2022 BCSC 317 (CanLII):
The standard of review on pure questions of law is one of correctness. The standard of review for findings of fact requires a palpable and overriding error. A palpable error is one that is obvious or plainly seen: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 at para. 5. An overriding error is an error that affects the outcome of the case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review on a judicial review of a decision of the Superintendent to uphold an IRP? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review of questions of law and findings of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an application for judicial review of a statutory tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court reviewing a decision of a trial judge concerning matters of custody and access? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review analysis on a judicial review application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator confirming a roadside driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BCSC review the applicable standard of review apply to a point of law arising in interlocutory proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate standard of review for an application for judicial review of patent unreasonableness? (British Columbia, Canada)
