How has the Supreme Court interpreted the principle of common law in the context of the discovery of fraudulent disclosure of personal data?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Yaremchuk v. Yaremchuk, 1998 ABQB 118 (CanLII):
This principle was applied by Mr. Justice Saunders in Metzner v. Metzner October 1997, B.C.J. No. 2903 at par. 51 through 55 and again in the case of McAfee v. McAfee February 1998, B.C.J. No 413 at par. 9 through 27.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court interpreted the definition of a personal injury policy in the context of personal injury claims? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of Jarman on Wills in the context of a will? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the " cardinal principle" in the context of constitutional law? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a common law wife entitled to use the term "common law husband" in the context of the common law husband? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle that no transfer or ownership passes or passes the estate unless the estate has already been registered? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted confidential information in the context of the manufacture of a carpet grip? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the Supreme Court of Canada considered “equality before the law” in the context of equal rights legislation? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court interpreted the law in the context of P.TO.O. protecting an employee’s safety shield? (Alberta, Canada)
