How have courts interpreted the principle that no transfer or ownership passes or passes the estate unless the estate has already been registered?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from MacLeod v. Montgomery Estate, 1979 ABCA 339 (CanLII):

In jurisdictions where land registration requirements make provision for passing title upon registration, as in s. 56 (supra) the courts have in general laid it down as principle that no transfer or ownership passes the estate unless the registration has already taken place: Macedo v. Stroud, (supra).

Other Questions


How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Court have any authority to transfer proceedings under R.12 from the Court of Appeal to the Superior Court? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of a plaintiff providing a piano forte to an auctioneer and instructing him to sell it for £40? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of proximity between investors in a real estate transaction where the real estate agent is selling real property in real estate? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle in Sansalone in determining whether to certify a class action? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of Jarman on Wills in the context of a will? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of community of interest in municipal legislation? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.