How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Lutz v. Kawa, 1979 CanLII 1021 (AB QB):

The Chief Justice then goes on [at p. 587] to adopt passages from the judgment of Parker J. in Doe d. Des Barres v. White (1842), 1 Kerr 595 (Can.), who in turn adopts principles followed in United States courts that: “… there has been a great unanimity on the subject, and a general opinion of the impropriety and inexpediency of giving any constructive effect to acts which do not of themselves clearly demonstrate the intention of the party to dispossess the owner.” (The italics are mine.)

Other Questions


How have the courts in Canada and the United States treated the US in the context of a federal government report on taxes? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a stay of execution of a motion for an application for a motion to overturn a motion of appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the scope of a review of the evidence in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
What authority does the Court of Appeal have in common with the Courts of Appeal in England and Wales? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for summary judgment in a motion for summary dismissal? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the " cardinal principle" in the context of constitutional law? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a claim of delay be considered relevant in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of Jarman on Wills in the context of a will? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the key cases in the history of the Court of Appeal in the United States? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the cost to the Court of Appeal of a motion where a motion is brought before a jury? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.