Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that the actions of a man who is not one but two at the same time, but not one who is the other?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Gray v. Richford, 1877 CanLII 6 (ON CA):

But that seems no more than an affirmation of the principle enunciated by Sir J. Romilly in Brown v. Gordon, 16 Beav. 308, and exemplified in other cases, that it does not follow, because a man fills various characters at the same time, that the acts done by him in one of those characters have reference to or can affect him in another of those characters. That principle does not seem applicable to the present case on any ground that has suggested itself to my mind.

Other Questions


Is there any case law that supports the argument that part-time employees constitute full-time employment? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that the cost of holding a trial in one county is less expensive to the parties than to the other? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that a child is financially dependent on their parent by reason of other cause? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that a plaintiff has reached a point in time past the point of payment of the required fees? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that there is public interest standing? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that there is a close temporal connection between the dates of two events? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that there are too many Interrogatories? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In a Workers’s Compensation Appeal Tribunal case, is there any case law that supports the argument that there is no case law in favour of a claim under the Employment Benefits Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that there is a “symbiotic relationship” between amount and duration under the SSAG? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that a primary ground of discrimination such as race, race, disability, and/or compound discrimination may have occurred as a result of multiple intersecting grounds? (Canada (Federal), Canada)