What is the current jurisprudence on the obligation to give sufficient reasons in a claim?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from WCAT-2009-03005 (Re), 2009 CanLII 77330 (BC WCAT):

Although not binding upon me, a helpful summary of recent jurisprudence relating to the obligation to give sufficient reasons, including the content of this obligation, is set out in WCAT-2009-00048, dated January 8, 2009. I note in particular the following extract from Baldwin v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal 2007 BCSC 942:

Other Questions


Is sufficient reason a sufficient reason to deny liability? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the limitation period for a plaintiff to claim after furnishing reasonably sufficient proof of loss for claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons given to Justice Wilson's decision that the pleadings failed to disclose any reasonable claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an obligation to become self-sufficient an obligation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in the history of the Court of Appeal to support the argument that reason is insufficient to support a claim of reason? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of reasonableness for using the term “reasonable” in a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a contract be used as a juristic reason sufficient to defeat a claim of unjust enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are sufficient reasons are required for a trial judge to leave a defendant with no reasonable doubt? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law regarding wills variation claims? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.