Is there any case law in the history of the Court of Appeal to support the argument that reason is insufficient to support a claim of reason?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from A1607022 (Re), 2017 CanLII 145382 (BC WCAT):
The unpersuasive nature of this kind of rationale is so well recognized that the courts developed the Latin maxim above to capture the deficiency of such reason. Ehrcke J. provided a helpful illustration of this Latin maxim in White v. Stonestreet, 2006 BCSC 801:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of B.C holding that the Court has jurisdiction to determine whether a person who is not a party to a particular type of tortfeasor has a valid claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a decision of appeal from a master be appealed from the Court of Appeal of the Master? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have discretion whether to apply spousal support under the Spousal Support Appeal Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the argument that appeal is from a result not a reason but a reason? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a Workers’s Compensation Appeal Tribunal case, is there any case law that supports the argument that there is no case law in favour of a claim under the Employment Benefits Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law supporting the argument that a claim is not a contractual claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the grounds for appeal against a decision by a judge at the Court of Appeal to overturn a support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review under s. 59(1) of the Rules of Appeal Court of Appeal for a motion of appeal against the decision of a judge on a question of mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
