The issue, in my view, is whether defence counsel’s improper disclosure had had an effect upon the jury’s consideration of the evidence in this case. I have no doubt that that misconduct has indeed had a very damaging effect on the “way the jury listened and understood the evidence”. Adopting this test, which is set out in de Araujo v. Kenneth Read 2004 BCCA 267, I find that I have no alternative but to declare a mistrial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.