Is there any case law in which a trial judge was wrong in finding that a plaintiff was not entitled to be held liable for sexual assault?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Michel v. Doe, 2009 BCCA 225 (CanLII):

On the evidence, I am unable to say the trial judge was plainly wrong in that conclusion: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235.

Other Questions


In a sexual assault trial where there are two versions of the same events, what is the role of the trial judge in determining whether the accused has proven his case beyond a reasonable doubt? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports a motion judge finding that a plaintiff has a genuine issue for trial over an unpaid bonus? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge in a sexual assault case be found to have objected to the words of the Judge at the trial of the accused? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the decisive ground of appeal in a sexual assault case where the trial judge failed to relate the evidence crucial to the defence to the issues to be decided by the jury? (Manitoba, Canada)
If a trial judge's finding of credibility is to depend solely on which person he thinks made the better appearance of sincerity in the witness box, what is the test for credibility? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a jury in a sexual assault trial where there are two competing versions of the facts? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Can a judge be held liable for failing to properly investigate an allegation of sexual assault? (Ontario, Canada)
Are there any cases where a trial judge asked questions on the subject of sexual orientation? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the trial judge determined the date of an alleged sexual assault? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a sexual assault is not a rape but a seduction? (Saskatchewan, Canada)