Is there any case law in which a trial judge was wrong in finding that a plaintiff was not entitled to be held liable for sexual assault?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Michel v. Doe, 2009 BCCA 225 (CanLII):

On the evidence, I am unable to say the trial judge was plainly wrong in that conclusion: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235.

Other Questions


Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of discretion of the Court of Appeal in dealing with allegations of sexual assault in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove that he was sexually assaulted at the time of an assault? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a trial judge's findings and conclusions of fact have been shown to be wrong? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admitting or denying an allegation of sexual assault in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances is a plaintiff entitled to rely on necessity in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a judge finds that a plaintiff has violated a plaintiff’s human rights in a civil case, does this rule apply? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge interfere with a trial judge's findings of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the findings of the jury in the trial of the former Queen of the South on 5 counts of sexual assault? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Whitelogo nobg 300dpi sm


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."


Trusted by top litigators from across North America.