What is the standard of review of affidavit evidence in the context of a duty to consult?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Buffalo River Dene Nation v The Minister of Energy and Resources, 2014 SKQB 69 (CanLII):

The question of the existence of a duty to consult is a question of law, unless the question is tied up with questions of fact. Here, the question is one of pure law, and so the standard of review is correctness: Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2004 SCC 73, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 511, at paragraphs 61‑63. Objection to affidavit evidence

Other Questions


What is the standard of appellate fact review in the context of an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the proper standard of review for reviewing the findings of a Commissioner of Inquiry? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review in the review of a finding that the verdict was unreasonable? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appeal against a finding that a decision made by the Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against the decision not to grant an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can evidence of a chemical analysis of a sample taken after the 2-hour period be used in evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard for a trial judge to accept all the evidence presented to the court? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When a non-parental third party like Mr. E.E.S seeks access to the child, what is the standard of evidence required by the court to determine that access is not appropriate? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of appellate review in a case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for allowing evidence to be adduce at the Court of Appeal in the context of an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision of an administrative tribunal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.