What is the standard of review for an appeal against a finding that a decision made by the Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against the decision not to grant an appeal?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Shields v. Saskatchewan Farm Land Security Board, 2010 SKQB 170 (CanLII):
Counsel for the parties agrees that the appeal should be conducted on the record as provided in Guinn v. Manitoba 2009 MBCA 82; [2009] 9 W.W.R. 1, and that the standard of review is that of reasonableness.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court review a decision by a majority of the Court of Appeal not adjourning on a motion of appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's decision not to disturb the findings of fact review? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the court have jurisdiction to deal with a motion where there has been no written decision or formal review decision? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for jurisdiction in a motion brought by the Court of Appeal in the Superior Court of Justice? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review in the review of a finding that the verdict was unreasonable? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If an appeal from a justice of the peace has been appealed to the wrong court, can the appeal be dismissed? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority or authority to refuse to grant an amendment to the Rules of Civil Procedure or Rules of Appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any jurisdiction to interfere in a finding of fact from the lower courts? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the proper standard of review for reviewing the findings of a Commissioner of Inquiry? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge at the Court of Appeal accept responsibility for differing as to the credibility of the witnesses at the Appeal Court? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
