What is the proper standard of review for reviewing the findings of a Commissioner of Inquiry?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Hartwig v. Commission of Inquiry into matters relating to the death of Neil Stonechild, 2008 SKCA 81 (CanLII):

The circumstances of this application point unequivocally in the direction of reasonableness as the proper standard to use in reviewing the Commissioner’s findings. The nature of the issue here – findings of fact – clearly indicates that the Commissioner’s work should be shown a significant amount of deference. He had the great advantage of seeing and hearing the testimony first hand and many of his central findings are rooted in assessments of credibility. Just as an appeal court should not lightly interfere with the findings of fact made by a trial judge, so a court acting in relation to a judicial review application should not lightly interfere with the findings of a commission of inquiry. See: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235.

Other Questions


What is the standard of review in the review of a finding that the verdict was unreasonable? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appeal against a finding that a decision made by the Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against the decision not to grant an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's decision not to disturb the findings of fact review? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of appellate fact review in the context of an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a request by the Chief Commissioner for Human Rights for an inquiry into allegations of sexual harassment against a plaintiff? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision of an administrative tribunal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of appellate review in a case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a panel member review the decision of the Chief Commissioner to dismiss a complaint? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a "de novo" review of a decision of the Chief Commissioner of Human Rights? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a finding of fact be reversed if the finding was based on a palpable and overriding error? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.