What is the standard of review in the review of a finding that the verdict was unreasonable?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Bear, 1999 CanLII 12278 (SK CA):
Given the standard of review of criminal matters as articulated in Yebes v. The Queen[1] we are unable to conclude that the verdict is unreasonable. The appeal on conviction is therefore dismissed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the proper standard of review for reviewing the findings of a Commissioner of Inquiry? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appeal against a finding that a decision made by the Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against the decision not to grant an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review for the grounds of appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a finding of fact be reversed if the finding was based on a palpable and overriding error? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision of an administrative tribunal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of appellate fact review in the context of an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's decision not to disturb the findings of fact review? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of appellate review in a case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the patent unreasonableness standard in the interpretation of a collective agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review of video of a meeting where a motion was brought before the council during the break? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
