How have the courts dealt with issues 2 and 3 in the summary process?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Doz, 1985 ABCA 71 (CanLII):
Issues 2 and 3 have been dealt with in the case of The Queen v. Cohn to which I have already alluded. The reasoning in that case which applies to these two issues operates against the appellant. Notwithstanding that the contempt and conviction appear to have taken place in a superior court the principles to be derived therefrom dealing with the summary process are in my view applicable in a court of inferior jurisdiction.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts dealt with the issue of custody and custody issues in a motion of motion of the same name? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a waiver be signed to allow a summary conviction court to transfer information between two summary conviction courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts dealt with cases dealing with human rights issues? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts dealt with standing issues? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of contractual covenanted that the master be paid by an agent? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts in Canada dealt with the issue of an underground oil tank? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of passport seizure by the police? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
