Does a plaintiff have met the burden of proving a causative link?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Bivadi v. Coggans, 2017 BCSC 656 (CanLII):

But the fact that the plaintiff has met the burden of proving a causative link does not necessarily mean the defendant is responsible for the full amount of his damages. When the analysis turns from liability to damages, the governing principle is that the defendant need not put the plaintiff in a better position than his original position and should not compensate the plaintiff for any damages he would have suffered anyway: Blackwater v. Plint, 2005 SCC 58 at para. 78.

Other Questions


What is the evidentiary burden for a plaintiff to prove that they are disabled? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a defendant to prove that a plaintiff has not followed a recommended course of medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
How much evidence will be required by a plaintiff to prove their case on the issue of causation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff has a right to a trial by jury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a plaintiff to prove that they were injured as a result of negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff acted unreasonably in her actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a plaintiff can work? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff’s considered decision not to undergo spinal fusion surgery is a failure to mitigate? (British Columbia, Canada)
How can a plaintiff prove causation in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff took steps that could have been taken to mitigate their loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.