What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff took steps that could have been taken to mitigate their loss?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Walks v Cody, 2019 BCSC 1371 (CanLII):

The defendants have the burden of establishing on a balance of probabilities that there were steps the plaintiff could have taken to mitigate; that those steps were reasonable; and the extent to which the loss would have been avoided by taking those steps: Graham v. Rogers, 2001 BCCA 432 at para. 35

Other Questions


What is the burden of proving a plaintiff has suffered a loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have a duty to mitigate their losses by taking steps such as closing a business and closing a bank? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a plaintiff fails to prove quantification of their loss by earnings or by capital asset, is that loss quantification quantified or quantified? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's failure to take steps to mitigate their losses? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate her loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving non-pecuniary loss to a plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff’s considered decision not to undergo spinal fusion surgery is a failure to mitigate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proof for a plaintiff in a claim for loss of future earnings due to loss of income due to climate change? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a defendant failed to mitigate for a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a plaintiff’s failure to mitigate? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.