What is the standard of review for determining causation?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from S.R. v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2007 SKAIA 62 (CanLII):

Instead we are guided by the principles for determining standard of review in Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)[4] and are satisfied that the appropriate standard of review on a question of causation is correctness. ONUS OF PROOF

Other Questions


What is the proper standard of review for reviewing the findings of a Commissioner of Inquiry? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review in the review of a finding that the verdict was unreasonable? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that its contents can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the objective test to apply in determining whether a physician exercised the appropriate standard of care? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision of an administrative tribunal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appeal against a finding that a decision made by the Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against the decision not to grant an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of appellate review in a case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of appellate fact review in the context of an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that the contents of the document can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When a non-parental third party like Mr. E.E.S seeks access to the child, what is the standard of evidence required by the court to determine that access is not appropriate? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.