In Landymore v. Hardy (1991), 21 R.P.R. (2d) 174 (N.S.S.C.T.D.) the defendants, who owned property encumbered by a right of first refusal, purported to convey the property to a company which they had incorporated for the sole purchase of purchasing the property at an inflated price. Their apparent intention was to trigger the right of first refusal in a manner that would preclude the holder of the right from purchasing the property. Saunders J. noted, at paras. 95-96: ...The grantor of a right of first refusal is not entitled to frustrate it by conveying the property in such a way as to avoid having to give the right in the first place... Relations between the giver and the holder of a right of first refusal must be characterized by good faith and reasonableness.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.