Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to an aider and abettor?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cooper, B300934 (Cal. App. 2020):
3. The natural and probable consequences doctrine provides that "an aider and abettor is guilty not only of the intended crime, but also 'for any other offense that was a "natural and probable consequence" of the crime aided and abetted.' [Citation.]" (People v. McCoy (2001) 25 Cal.4th 1111, 1117.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to an aider and abettor in an attempted murder case? (California, United States of America)
Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to conspirators and aiders and abettors? (California, United States of America)
Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to conspirators and aiders and abettors? (California, United States of America)
Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to those aider and abettor of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for failing to provide sufficient evidence to convict an aider and abettor under the doctrine of natural and probable consequences? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an aider and abettor to be found guilty of a crime under the "natural and probable consequence" doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the nature and probable consequences of the natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant can be held liable as an aider and abettor under the 'natural and probable consequences' doctrine? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury rely on the natural and probable consequences doctrine to find a defendant guilty in 1 for first degree premeditated murder as an aider and abettor? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant convicted of first degree murder as an aider and abettor under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
