Does Power have any policy reason to preclude instruction when there are successive medical care provided by a chain of doctors?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Maxwell v. Powers, 22 Cal.App.4th 1596, 28 Cal.Rptr.2d 62 (Cal. App. 1994):

Powers does not offer any policy reason to preclude the instruction when there is successive medical care provided by a chain of doctors. Nor can we discern one. As the court observed in Carter v. Shirley (1986) 21 Mass.App.Ct. 503, 488 N.E.2d 16:

Other Questions


Is a court required to provide an instruction that duplicates the instruction provided by the appellant? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for failing to provide a reasonable probability that defendant would have obtained a more favourable result if counsel had failed to provide counsel with reasonable counsel? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of failing to provide medical treatment, payment for self-procured medical treatment and medications? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of failing to provide the requested instructions in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Is an expert who provides emergency medical services in an emergency room qualified to testify in a medical malpractice action? (California, United States of America)
Is a motor vehicle insurance policy that includes a policy of insurance that includes uninsured motorist coverage precludes stacking of uninsured motor vehicle coverages? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
Does failure to object at trial preclude appellate review of reasonable doubt instructions? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.