Is a court required to provide an instruction that duplicates the instruction provided by the appellant?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Godinez-Flores, A129389 (Cal. App. 2011):
Because appellant's proposed instruction simply duplicated the instruction the court did provide, the court was not required to give it. (People v. Hovarter, supra, 44 Cal.4th at p. 1021.) We find no error on this ground.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Is an appeal moot when, through no fault of the appellant, an event occurs which makes it impossible for the reviewing court to provide any effective relief to the appellant even when ruling in the appellant's favor? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a decision by the appellate court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does appellant have to provide a satisfactory explanation from appellant's counsel for his conduct toward appellant? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a decision by the appellate court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does section 7895 of the California Family Code require an appellate court to appoint counsel for a parent unable to afford counsel for their child who is a dependent child of the juvenile court? (California, United States of America)
