Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a decision by the appellate court to instruct or not to instruct a jury?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Jimenez, H039607 (Cal. App. 2014):

"An appellate court applies the abuse of discretion standard of review to any decision by a trial court to instruct, or not to instruct, in its exercise of its supervision over a deliberating jury." (People v. Waidla (2000) 22 Cal.4th 690, 745-746.)

Other Questions


Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a decision by the appellate court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a decision by the appellate court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a decision by the appellate court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse standard of review apply to any decision by the trial court to instruct or not to instruct? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have to consider whether a jury has been instructed to disregard an instruction from the Court of Appeal that is not supported by how the jury views the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to any ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury's finding on a felony-murder special-circumstance allegation based on erroneous instruction that a jury would not have convicted appellant of second degree murder if the jury had been given the same instruction? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.