What is the burden of mitigation against a defendant?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Ehman v Preston Chevrolet Buick GMC Cadillac Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1033 (CanLII):

Where a defendant asserts that a plaintiff’s damages should be reduced on the basis of a failure to mitigate, the defendant has the burden to show both that: (a) the plaintiff has failed to take reasonable steps to find alternate employment; and (b) that alternate employment could likely have been obtained had reasonable steps been taken: see Nardulli v. C-W Agencies Inc, 2012 BCSC 1686, at paras. 448-451.

Other Questions


What is the burden of proving a defendant failed to mitigate for a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a defendant to mitigate damages pending trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff took steps that could have been taken to mitigate their loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a defendant to prove that a plaintiff has not mitigated their damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of mitigation against a plaintiff who failed to attend recommended treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a defendant to prove that a plaintiff has not followed a recommended course of medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of mitigation in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of reducing damages on the basis of failure to mitigate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of showing mitigation against a second husband in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff’s considered decision not to undergo spinal fusion surgery is a failure to mitigate? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.