What is the burden of proving a defendant failed to mitigate for a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Zigawe v. Rance, 2009 BCSC 1816 (CanLII):

The defendant bears the burden of proving a failure to mitigate (Graham v. Rogers, 2001 BCCA 432, 90 B.C.L.R. (3d) 69), and must establish the plaintiff failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate her loss and injury.

Other Questions


What is the burden of proving a plaintiff’s claim for medical malpractice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a plaintiff's complaint in a medical malpractice case has a psychological rather than physical explanation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a plaintiff and a defendant in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the entire agreement clause in a medical malpractice case apply to all medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a plaintiff failed to mitigate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a defendant to prove that a plaintiff has not followed a recommended course of medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving causation in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for meeting the threshold burden of a claim in an action brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are some cases where a plaintiff was found to have failed to mitigate her losses as a result of failing to receive cortisone injections and physiotherapy? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.