What is the case law in favour of a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Miller v. Merck Frosst Canada Ltd., 2013 BCSC 544 (CanLII):

The plaintiff responds and I agree, that Wakelam v. Johnson & Johnson, 2009 BCSC 839, provides support for their position despite it relating to an application for particulars:

Other Questions


Is there any case law in which a plaintiff's complaint in a medical malpractice case has a psychological rather than physical explanation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the entire agreement clause in a medical malpractice case apply to all medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care of the medical staff in the context of medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required by the Canadian Medical Association in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of fair compensation for a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of negligence on a plaintiff's medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for meeting the threshold burden of a claim in an action brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages awarded in a medical malpractice case where a plaintiff was unable to work at gainful employment for the rest of his working life because of the interference with his enjoyment of life? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of damages for pain and suffering suffered by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to advance a future cost of care claim, in a medical malpractice action, to have a physician testify to the medical necessity of each and every item of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.