What is the burden of showing mitigation against a second husband in a personal injury action?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Sharp-Barker v. Fehr, 1982 CanLII 802 (BC SC):

But it has been made clear by Ball v. Kraft, supra, that the mere fact of remarriage does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that some financial benefit will (or was) reaped by the widow, The burden of showing mitigation and its extent lies on the defendant, and the earning power, stability and health of the second husband as well as his attitude towards a stepchild would have distinct bearing on the issue of damage.

Other Questions


In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
If historical driving records are relevant in personal injury actions, would they be relevant in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of mitigation in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of mitigation for a plaintiff in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party to a personal injury action entitled to production of a party’s personal injury report? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff recover large amounts of personal injury damages from a vocational consultant? (British Columbia, Canada)
How does mitigation work in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is mitigation in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.