California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from First Nationwide Savings v. Perry, 11 Cal.App.4th 1657, 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 173 (Cal. App. 1992):
Second, an unjust enrichment claim is based upon equitable principles. These equitable principles may outweigh the reasons for prohibiting deficiency judgments. In fact, in other situations equitable considerations cause the prohibition against deficiency judgments to give way. Bad faith waste is an example. A nonassuming grantee of a purchase money deed of trust would be liable for bad faith waste to the property. (Cornelison v. Kornbluth (1975) 15 Cal.3d 590, 604, 125 Cal.Rptr. 557, 542 P.2d 981.) This is so even though the grantee would not be liable for any deficiency judgment upon a purchase money deed of trust. By parity of reasoning, we believe that in appropriate circumstances an action for unjust enrichment could be stated against a nonassuming grantee under a purchase money deed of trust.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.