Can a purchaser at a sale under a deed of trust bring a cross-complaint and affirmative defense in a proceeding in unlawful detainer?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Cruce v. Stein, 146 Cal.App.2d 688, 304 P.2d 118 (Cal. App. 1956):

Cheney v. Trauzettel, supra, was a proceeding in unlawful detainer brought under section 1161a of the Code of Civil Procedure by the purchaser at a sale under a deed of trust. The defendants answered and cross-complained, setting up a claim of title and several other defenses, including the pendency of a quiet title suit between the parties involving the same property. The trial court, on motion of the plaintiffs, struck out the cross-complaint and special defenses and gave judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants appealed and in affirming the judgment the court stated, 9 Cal.2d at pages 159-160, 69 P.2d at page 833: 'The trial court properly held that in the summary proceeding in unlawful detainer the right to possession alone was involved, and the broad question of title could not be raised and litigated by cross-complaint or affirmative defense. [Citing cases.] It is true that where the purchaser at a trustee's sale proceeds under section 1161a of the Code of Civil Procedure he must prove his acquisition of title by purchase at the sale; but it is only to this limited extent, as provided by the statute, that the title may be litigated in such a proceeding. [Citing cases.]

Other Questions


Does the statute of limitations apply when excess rent is used as an affirmative defense to an unlawful detainer action? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations apply when excess rent is offsetted as an affirmative defense to an unlawful detainer action? (California, United States of America)
Can a nonassuming grantee of a purchase money deed of trust bring an unjust enrichment claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for the difference between the amount purchased by a purchaser and the amount paid by the purchaser? (California, United States of America)
Can a certificate of occupancy be used as a defense to an action for unlawful detainer? (California, United States of America)
How have the trustees of a trust been found to have breached their fiduciary duties toward the trust by failing to disclose to the trustee that the trustees have a conflict of interest in the trust? (California, United States of America)
Can a landlord use res judicata and collateral estoppel to bar a tenant from bringing an unlawful detainer action? (California, United States of America)
What is the common law common law defense in an unlawful detainer action? (California, United States of America)
Does the defense have to argue to the jury an affirmative defense of consensual sodomy? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for whether a plaintiff can bring an unlawful detainer claim? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.