How have courts treated the absence of argument on appeal regarding the unjust enrichment claim?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Rutledge v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 190 Cal.Rptr.3d 411, 238 Cal.App.4th 1164 (Cal. App. 2015):

3 Appellants made no argument in the trial court and no argument on appeal regarding their unjust enrichment claim. We deem this issue waived. (Interinsurance Exchange v. Collins (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 1445, 1448, 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 126 [the absence of argument allows this court to treat the point as waived].)

3 Appellants made no argument in the trial court and no argument on appeal regarding their unjust enrichment claim. We deem this issue waived. (Interinsurance Exchange v. Collins (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 1445, 1448, 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 126 [the absence of argument allows this court to treat the point as waived].)

Other Questions


Can a defendant bring a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal claiming that he failed to raise his constitutional claims in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In a petition for a rehearing of the Superior Court of Appeal, what is the Attorney General's argument that defendant's arguments are not cognizable on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings and conclusions of the Court of Appeal in the Appeal Court of Ontario regarding the conduct of appellant's appointed attorney? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to the benefit of the Court of Appeal's Appeal of Appeal when they are not yet convicted? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a defendant's claim that counsel failed to object to the trial court's incorrect belief that he had expressed no remorse at his initial sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of Justice on Beach's appeal against a finding that an autopsy photograph of the victim was unduly prejudicial and lacked probative value? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court treat a claim by a defendant that an issue raised and decided in the trial court resulted in constitutional violations? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal in Ontario dealt with appellant's claim that he was prejudiced by the error-strewn trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a court of appeal has an appealable judgment or order before it, does the court have jurisdiction to affirm, reverse or modify it? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have found that Defendant Joiner did not waive his assumed constitutional right to be personally present at the remand hearing and that the court erred in conducting that hearing in his absence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.