The other person eventually did sign similar guarantees for the bank and the bank has obtained default judgment against him and is prepared to assign the judgment to the appellant. As such, the appellant has whatever benefit he would have had, even if the alleged representation was made, which is denied, and even if such representation were admitted as evidence at trial, which is unlikely as it contradicts the “entire agreement” clause contained in the guarantee form: Hawrish v. Bank of Montreal (1969), 1969 CanLII 2 (SCC), 2 D.L.R. (3d) 600 (S.C.C.). We were advised, in any event, that the other guarantor is in bankruptcy.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.