When a motion judge approved the sale agreement and technology license agreement and approval of the sale and sale agreement, what analysis applied?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Canrock Ventures LLC v. Ambercore Software Inc, 2011 ONCA 414 (CanLII):

The motion judge appropriately applied the analysis in Royal Bank v. Soundair in approving the sale agreement and technology license agreement. He explained why the proposed transaction was reasonable in the new circumstances, including why the earlier concerns were either addressed by the receiver’s subsequent actions or outweighed by the changed facts at the time of the motion before him. Given the deference that must be given to his decision, we see neither an error in principle nor any reason to interfere with his exercise of discretion.

Other Questions


Can a motion judge withhold approval of a fee agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a motion judge interfere with the analysis and conclusion of a judge's assessment of the nature of the expression? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the consequences of errors in a motion judge’s spousal support analysis? (Ontario, Canada)
Can Rule 20 considerations be applied to a first step analysis of a rule 49.09 motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a judge proceed cautiously if she conducts a stage two policy analysis under the Anns test on a pre-trial motion? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a motion judge strike down a negotiated settlement agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a motion judge order that there is no settlement agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a motion judge make a finding that no settlement agreement exists? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the arguments that challenge a motion judge's interpretation of a commercial agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a motion judge's decision not to interfere with the decision of the motion judge? (Manitoba, Canada)