In my previous reasons for judgment in this case, indexed as Page v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2009 BCSC 493, I allowed the petitioner’s petition for judicial review. I directed that the parties could address the matter of costs on a set schedule. The schedule was not adhered to; I have now received written submissions with respect to costs from both parties. My decision as to costs is set out below.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.