What is the test for judicial review of the findings of the Disability Review Officer's findings of fact, law or mixed fact and law?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Gichuru v. Palmar Properties Inc., 2011 BCSC 827 (CanLII):

Accordingly, for those grounds of judicial review which relate to the DROs’ findings of fact, law, or mixed fact and law, the petitioner bears the onus of showing that those findings are patently unreasonable: Manz v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2009 BCCA 92.

Other Questions


What is the standard of review applied to a judge's findings of fact and mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of a police officer's findings in a judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for applying palpable and overriding error standard in appellate review of findings of fact and of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a judicial review of a finding of fact, law or mixed fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of a judge's findings of mixed fact and law or of fact? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can an appellate court substitute a trial judge’s findings of fact or mixed findings of law with its own? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable in a judicial review of a visa officer's decision? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a trial judge's findings of fact and the inferences drawn by her? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a trial judge's findings of fact on appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a trial judge's findings of fact and any inferences drawn? (Manitoba, Canada)