The court relied on O’Reilly v. Mackman, [1983] 2 A.C. 237 in which Lord Diplock recognized that there may be exceptions to the general rule that it would be contrary to public policy and an abuse of process to allow a person seeking to establish that a decision of a public authority infringed his rights to proceed by way of ordinary action rather than by judicial review. Those exceptions should be determined on a case-by-case basis. ¶ 25 and 26.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.