What is the test for reasonableness where there are procedural errors to be corrected?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from United States v. Pugh, 937 F.3d 108 (2nd Cir. 2019):
substantive reasonableness where there are procedural errors to be corrected. See United States v. Cavera , 550 F.3d 180, 189-90 (2d Cir. 2008) (en banc ). But I believe that the demand for more explanation also, inevitably, implies that substantive problems may underly this sentence as well.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If there is an error in the finding that a defendant is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of reasonable doubt, is that error harmless beyond reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for "plain error" in a motion challenging the procedural reasonableness of a sentence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court committed plain error by failing to correct an error? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What constitutes a procedural error or substantive error in a federal district court's sentence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a trial judge make a grievous error of instructing the jury that a defendant charged with murder would be released from prison if found not guilty by reason of reason of insanity? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain relief under Rule 36 of the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 to correct a clerical error in sentencing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that a constitutional error or procedural error contributed to a sentence imposed by a plea? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a sentence on appeal, can the Court consider whether the sentence was based on procedural error rather than substantive reasonableness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining that a constitutional error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the reasons for exclusion been explained in the reasons of the board? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
