What is the test for establishing that the relevant facts are undisputed?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from County of Santa Clara v. Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n of Santa Clara County, Inc., 285 Cal.Rptr. 307, 4 Cal.App.4th 1791 (Cal. App. 1991):

The parties stipulated and the trial court found that the relevant facts were undisputed. "Where the facts are not in conflict and the issue involves the proper application of a statute or administrative regulation, a reviewing court is not bound by the trial court's determination. [Citations.] In the case under review, the cause was submitted on stipulated facts and supplemental documentary and testamentary evidence. There was no substantial conflict in the supplemental evidence bearing upon the interpretation of the ... regulation. We are, therefore, not bound by the trial court's finding, but must make our own determination...." (Shoban v. Board of Trustees (1969) 276 Cal.App.2d 534, 541, 81 Cal.Rptr. 112.)

Other Questions


Does the fact that appellant was found incompetent after the trial not establish that he was incompetent during the trial, but does not establish he was competent at the time of trial? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to appeal against a conviction for assault, what are the relevant facts in the statement of facts? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a relationship between permissively inferred fact and proven fact? (California, United States of America)
What are the relevant facts relevant to the extension of the statute of limitations? (California, United States of America)
On what basis is review a de novo review when the relevant facts are undisputed and the issue on appeal requires interpretation? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of establishing all preliminary facts pertinent to determining relevancy of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test of relevance, relevance and abuse of discretion in determining the admissibility of evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a legal proposition that is stated in broader terms than called for by the facts to which it is applied? (California, United States of America)
Does an expert opinion need to be established to establish the corpus delicti? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that a greater number of aggravating than mitigating circumstances may be established in aggravating circumstances determine whether a lower term is justified? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.