What is the test for establishing a relationship between permissively inferred fact and proven fact?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Jimenez, 201 Cal.Rptr.3d 76, 246 Cal.App.4th 726 (Cal. App. 2016):

"The due process clauses of the federal Constitution ... require a relationship between the permissively inferred fact and the proven fact on which it depends." (People v. Mendoza (2000) 24 Cal.4th 130, 180, 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 485, 6 P.3d 150.) The standard of evaluating this relationship has been variously described as " rational connection, " " more likely than not, " and " reasonable doubt. " (

[246 Cal.App.4th 735]

Other Questions


What is the test for establishing that a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reasonable inference to establish material facts such as identity, intent or motive? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the permissive inference in a sexual assault case allow the jury to draw an irrational inference? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that appellant was found incompetent after the trial not establish that he was incompetent during the trial, but does not establish he was competent at the time of trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a contractual relationship or fiduciary relationship need to be established before liability for negligent misrepresentation can be found? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that facts can be proven and purpose can be proved? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing an agency relationship between an informant and a jailhouse inmate? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that entry sufficient to establish a burglary has occurred? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that a greater number of aggravating than mitigating circumstances may be established in aggravating circumstances determine whether a lower term is justified? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.