What is the test for establishing that a defendant engaged in conduct that violated a gang injunction?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bernardo M. (In re Bernardo M.), F065906 (Cal. App. 2014):
Further, in order to prove appellant engaged in conduct that violated a gang injunction one element the prosecutor had to prove was appellant's knowledge of his associate's gang membership. (People ex rel. Gallo v. Acuna (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1090, 1117.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667.61 of the California Penal Code require a defendant to engage in a course of conduct in which he or she is a co-defendant? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing the voluntariness of a defendant's statements, or of improper police conduct, is the Miranda waiver violation or Miranda waiver violated? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing intent in a criminal case when a defendant has committed an uncharged act of violence against another defendant? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
If an attorney has engaged in non-fiduciary conduct with a client, is that non-professional conduct prohibited? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the prosecution reduced the burden of proving a defendant's guilt by failing to instruct the jury that refusal was insufficient to establish guilt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because the trial court relieved the prosecution of its burden of establishing that defendant acted with malice? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
