What is the test for a person to be deemed a "defendant" of a crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Larios, 256 Cal.Rptr.3d 223, 42 Cal.App.5th 956 (Cal. App. 2019):

imputed to a person based solely on his or her participation in a crime" (id. , subd. (a)(3)), it made no exceptions for attempted murder, which indisputably requires express malice. ( People v. Booker , supra , 51 Cal.4th at p. 178, 119 Cal.Rptr.3d 722, 245 P.3d 366.) By failing to exclude attempted

[256 Cal.Rptr.3d 231]

Other Questions


Is a person who aids or abets a crime liable for the crime if the original crime was committed independently by another person? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is convicted of receiving stolen property in one crime, but never charged or convicted of the other crime, be required to pay restitution for losses sustained in other crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who commits a violent crime against several victims more culpable than a violent offender who commits violent crimes against one person more than one? (California, United States of America)
Is a claim for damages brought by defendant in a personal injury action brought by plaintiff against defendant in the Superior Court of Appeal against Defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant defend against criminal charges by showing that a third person committed the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant defend against criminal charges by showing that a third person committed the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the target crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.