When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hussain, F071347 (Cal. App. 2017):
Such evidence is also relevant "when a defendant admits committing an act but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, [and] other-crimes evidence is admissible to show absence of accident." (People v. Whisenhunt (2008) 44 Cal.4th 174, 204.) "Intent" and "absence of accident" are "two ways of describing the same relevant issue," that defendant performed the alleged acts "intentionally rather than accidentally." (Ibid.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.
Other Questions
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime, does other-crimes evidence admissible? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there were two crimes committed at the same time, one committed with the same intent and objectives, and the other committed with different intentions and objectives? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence that a defendant committed a crime other than the charged crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who commits a violent crime against several victims more culpable than a violent offender who commits violent crimes against one person more than one? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of crimes committed by a defendant other than those charged admissible to prove criminal disposition or poor character? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who committed an assault with intent to commit sex crimes such as kidnapping, rape and forcible oral copulation receive a determinate sentence for the assault that followed? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence that a defendant committed crimes other than those he is currently charged with? (California, United States of America)
