California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Ratcliffe, E063690 (Cal. App. 2017):
Defendant contends the trial court prejudicially erred when it denied his motion to suppress his statement to detectives on July 20, 2011. He claims that his statements, made after waiving his rights under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda), were obtained through deception, manipulation and promises of leniency. We disagree.
1. Further Background Facts.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.