How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda Statement?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bunyard, 249 Cal.Rptr. 71, 45 Cal.3d 1189, 756 P.2d 795 (Cal. 1988):
Defendant next contends that the court erred by allowing the prosecutor to refer, in argument, to a portion of a statement of defendant ruled inadmissible under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694. Even if we assume that the trial court erred in this respect, any error was not prejudicial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda rights in this context? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a trial court's decision on the Miranda issue, does the court have to agree that a statement was obtained in violation of the Miranda Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the Miranda rights of a minor who, as a minor, waived his Miranda right to be arrested? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the prosecutor's statement that the jury's verdict must be based on the evidence presented in court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant's Miranda waiver? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted Miranda warnings in the context of the Miranda waiver? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the rules of evidence in cases dealing with self-confessed statements made outside of court? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda warning that anything he said could and would be used against him? (California, United States of America)
