What is the standard of review to any ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Ledesma, A125441 (Cal. App. 2012):
As we stated previously we " 'appl[y] the abuse of discretion standard of review to any ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence, including one that turns on the relative probativeness and prejudice of the evidence in question [citations].' " (People v. Jablonski, supra, 37 Cal.4th at p. 805.)
1. Background
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the abuse of discretion standard of review applicable to any trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence in limine or during trial? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence of other crimes? (California, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to "any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence"? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
