What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Ekelem v. Nwajei, F072414 (Cal. App. 2017):
The appellate review of trial court rulings on the admissibility of evidence is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard of review. (Pannu v. Land Rover North America, Inc. (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 1298, 1317.)
A lower court judgment is presumed correct and all presumptions are indulged to support it on matters where the record is silent. Error must be affirmatively shown by the appellant. (Denham v. Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 557, 564.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the "abuse of standard" applied by appellate judges to review a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence of a handgun? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence of other crimes? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to "any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence"? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence in limine or during trial? (California, United States of America)
