What is the abuse of discretion standard of review applicable to any trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Miroskins, E070567 (Cal. App. 2019):

The abuse of discretion standard of review applies to any trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence. (People v. Guera (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1067, 1113.) Discretion is abused when a court exceeds the bounds of reason when all circumstances are considered. (People v. Giminez (1975) 14 Cal.3d 68, 72.) On appeal, defendant has failed to address the abuse of discretion standard of review and simply treats the appeal as a new forum to argue his in limine motion.

Other Questions


What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
How do courts review a trial court's ruling on whether an examiner's question calls for a speculative answer under the abuse of discretion standard? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence including one that turns on hearsay? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to "any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence"? (California, United States of America)
What is the "abuse of standard" applied by appellate judges to review a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence of a handgun? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.