California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lopez v. Pac. Bell Tel. Co., A135589 (Cal. App. 2014):
10. The court rejected plaintiffs attempt to analogize the required vehicle exception to the "going and coming rule" discussed in Lobo v. Tamco (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 297, 302-303, a case involving application of respondeat superior and the going and coming rule to an employee driver's negligence in causing a fatal accident. Plaintiffs do not raise this theory on appeal.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.