California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Price v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 209 Cal.Rptr. 674, 37 Cal.3d 559, 693 P.2d 254 (Cal. 1984):
Nor was any "special risk" created by the employment in this case which might make inapplicable the going and coming rule. Contrary to the majority's characterization, applicant was not "forced" to wait in a place of danger such as the applicant in Parks v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1983) 33 Cal.3d 585, 190 Cal.Rptr. 158, 660 P.2d 382 (applicant injured while stuck in usual heavy school traffic outside workplace). There was no indication in the record that applicant herein was regularly subjected to any delay in work access or to any foreseeable risk of injury, or that any prior, similar accidents had ever taken place. In essence, applicant was injured while engaged in an act of personal convenience
Page 682
I would affirm the board's decision denying benefits.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.