California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Green v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 187 Cal.App.3d 1419, 232 Cal.Rptr. 465 (Cal. App. 1986):
The going and coming rule precludes compensation for injuries suffered during a local commute to or from a fixed place of business at fixed hours absent special or extraordinary circumstances. (Hinojosa v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd. (1972) 8 Cal.3d 150, 157, 104 Cal.Rptr. 456, 501 P.2d 1176.) The rule, however, is subject to many exceptions. (Dimmig v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd. (1972) 6 Cal.3d 860, 866, 101 Cal.Rptr. 105, 495 P.2d 433.)
Among the various exceptions to the going and coming rule is the special mission or special errand exception. (Hinojosa v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 8 Cal.3d at p. 159, 104 Cal.Rptr. 456, 501 P.2d 1176.) " 'An injury suffered by an employee during his regular commute is compensable if he was also performing a special mission for his employer.' [Citation.] The employee's conduct is 'special' if it is 'extraordinary in relation to routine duties,
Page 467
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.