What is the burden of demonstrating there is a genuine need for a trial?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Saskatchewan Wheat Pool v. Strait Crossing Group Ltd., 2002 SKQB 515 (CanLII):

Since a defendant in that position bears the burden of demonstrating that there is a genuine need for a trial, it is not enough for the defendant merely to say there is a good defence on the merits or material element in fact is in dispute. The defendant is required to demonstrate that that is so: Royal Bank v. Malouf. Nor is it enough for the defendant merely to show that the cause of action is complex or gives rise to a question of law. Neither in itself is an answer to a properly constituted application, for neither necessarily warrants a trial. . .

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the trial judge allow the parents of a plaintiff to participate in the trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for changing a jury trial to a different jury trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the evidentiary burden for a direction of trial of an issue? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the evidential standard for admission of evidence at trial where issues of trial fairness are concerned? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there a genuine need to proceed to a full trial of these issues? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a defendant at trial advance the defence of misrepresentation at trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the jury been instructed in a sexual assault trial to consider corroboration evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the grounds of appeal against the finding that a learned trial judge erred in fact and law in ruling that the force used was substantial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the consequences of a trial judge’s failure to spell out every consideration leading to a finding of credibility? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the current practice of paying the costs of a party in an abortive trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.