Since a defendant in that position bears the burden of demonstrating that there is a genuine need for a trial, it is not enough for the defendant merely to say there is a good defence on the merits or material element in fact is in dispute. The defendant is required to demonstrate that that is so: Royal Bank v. Malouf. Nor is it enough for the defendant merely to show that the cause of action is complex or gives rise to a question of law. Neither in itself is an answer to a properly constituted application, for neither necessarily warrants a trial. . .
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.